Australia vs Hong Kong (China): Binding coverage, all products
Australia
0.0%
in 2022
Hong Kong (China)
0.0%
in 2022
Australia rank
60th
Hong Kong (China) rank
60th
Binding coverage, all products over time
- Australia
- Hong Kong (China)
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Hong Kong (China), a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 60th and Hong Kong (China) ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Hong Kong (China) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 97.4% | 49.6% | 47.8% | Australia |
| 2000s | 97.2% | 48.6% | 48.6% | Australia |
| 2010s | 97.2% | 49.4% | 47.7% | Australia |
| 2020s | 64.8% | 33.2% | 31.6% | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, all products, Australia or Hong Kong (China)?
- Australia, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Hong Kong (China) as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, all products between Australia and Hong Kong (China)?
- 0.0%, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Hong Kong (China)?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2022.
- How do Australia and Hong Kong (China) rank globally for binding coverage, all products?
- Australia ranks 60th and Hong Kong (China) ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable.