Australia vs Latvia: Binding coverage, all products
Australia
0.0%
in 2022
Latvia
0.0%
in 2022
Australia rank
60th
Latvia rank
60th
Binding coverage, all products over time
- Australia
- Latvia
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Latvia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 60th and Latvia ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 97.1% | 85.7% | 11.4% | Australia |
| 2010s | 97.2% | 100.0% | 2.8% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 64.8% | 66.7% | 1.9% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, all products, Australia or Latvia?
- Australia, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Latvia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, all products between Australia and Latvia?
- 0.0%, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Latvia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
- How do Australia and Latvia rank globally for binding coverage, all products?
- Australia ranks 60th and Latvia ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable.