Bangladesh vs Namibia: Binding coverage, all products
Bangladesh
17.3%
in 2022
Namibia
0.0%
in 2022
Bangladesh rank
58th
Namibia rank
60th
Binding coverage, all products over time
- Bangladesh
- Namibia
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 17.3% against 0.0% in Namibia, a difference of 17.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Namibia ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 58th and Namibia ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.4% | 96.2% | 79.9% | Namibia |
| 2010s | 16.9% | 94.8% | 77.9% | Namibia |
| 2020s | 17.3% | 62.9% | 45.6% | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, all products, Bangladesh or Namibia?
- Bangladesh, at 17.3% against 0.0% in Namibia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, all products between Bangladesh and Namibia?
- 17.3%, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Namibia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
- How do Bangladesh and Namibia rank globally for binding coverage, all products?
- Bangladesh ranks 58th and Namibia ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable.