Botswana vs Latvia: Binding coverage, all products

Botswana
0.0%
in 2022
Latvia
0.0%
in 2022
Botswana rank
60th
Latvia rank
60th

Binding coverage, all products over time

  • Botswana
  • Latvia
020406080100200120112022

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Latvia, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 60th and Latvia ranks 60th of 158 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Latvia Difference Ahead
2000s 96.2% 85.7% 10.5% Botswana
2010s 94.7% 100.0% 5.3% Latvia
2020s 62.9% 66.7% 3.7% Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher binding coverage, all products, Botswana or Latvia?
Botswana, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Latvia as of 2022.
What is the difference in binding coverage, all products between Botswana and Latvia?
0.0%, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Latvia?
20 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
How do Botswana and Latvia rank globally for binding coverage, all products?
Botswana ranks 60th and Latvia ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Binding coverage, all products (%)
Unit
%
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
159 places, 3,312 data points, 1995–2022
Last refreshed

Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable.