Congo vs North Macedonia: Binding coverage, all products
Congo
0.0%
in 2022
North Macedonia
0.0%
in 2022
Congo rank
60th
North Macedonia rank
60th
Binding coverage, all products over time
- Congo
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 12 years both countries report, North Macedonia has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 60th and North Macedonia ranks 60th of 158 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.7% | 100.0% | 83.3% | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 16.9% | 100.0% | 83.1% | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, all products, Congo or North Macedonia?
- Congo, at 0.0% against 0.0% in North Macedonia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, all products between Congo and North Macedonia?
- 0.0%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and North Macedonia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2022.
- How do Congo and North Macedonia rank globally for binding coverage, all products?
- Congo ranks 60th and North Macedonia ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable.