Cyprus vs Tanzania: Binding coverage, all products

Cyprus
0.0%
in 2022
Tanzania
0.0%
in 2022
Cyprus rank
60th
Tanzania rank
60th

Binding coverage, all products over time

  • Cyprus
  • Tanzania
020406080100199620092022

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Tanzania, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Tanzania ahead.

Cyprus ranks 60th and Tanzania ranks 60th of 158 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cyprus averaged higher in 3 and Tanzania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0% 14.4% 14.4% Tanzania
2000s 83.3% 13.9% 69.4% Cyprus
2010s 100.0% 14.3% 85.7% Cyprus
2020s 66.7% 9.8% 56.9% Cyprus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher binding coverage, all products, Cyprus or Tanzania?
Cyprus, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Tanzania as of 2022.
What is the difference in binding coverage, all products between Cyprus and Tanzania?
0.0%, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Tanzania?
20 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2022.
How do Cyprus and Tanzania rank globally for binding coverage, all products?
Cyprus ranks 60th and Tanzania ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Binding coverage, all products (%)
Unit
%
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
159 places, 3,312 data points, 1995–2022
Last refreshed

Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable.