El Salvador vs Namibia: Binding coverage, all products

El Salvador
0.0%
in 2022
Namibia
0.0%
in 2022
El Salvador rank
60th
Namibia rank
60th

Binding coverage, all products over time

  • El Salvador
  • Namibia
020406080100199520082022

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Namibia, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2001 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 60th and Namibia ranks 60th of 158 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Namibia Difference Ahead
2000s 100.0% 96.2% 3.7% El Salvador
2010s 100.0% 94.7% 5.3% El Salvador
2020s 66.7% 62.9% 3.7% El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher binding coverage, all products, El Salvador or Namibia?
El Salvador, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Namibia as of 2022.
What is the difference in binding coverage, all products between El Salvador and Namibia?
0.0%, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Namibia?
20 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
How do El Salvador and Namibia rank globally for binding coverage, all products?
El Salvador ranks 60th and Namibia ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Binding coverage, all products (%)
Unit
%
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
159 places, 3,312 data points, 1995–2022
Last refreshed

Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable.