Which has higher binding coverage, all products, Hong Kong (China) or Republic of Korea?

Hong Kong (China), at 0.0% against 0.0% in Republic of Korea as of 2022.

What is the difference in binding coverage, all products between Hong Kong (China) and Republic of Korea?

0.0%, with Hong Kong (China) ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong (China) and Republic of Korea?

26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2022.

Where does this data come from?

Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Hong Kong (China) vs Republic of Korea: Binding coverage, all products

Hong Kong (China)

0.0%

in 2022

Republic of Korea

0.0%

in 2022

Hong Kong (China) rank

60th

Republic of Korea rank

60th

Binding coverage, all products over time

Hong Kong (China)
Republic of Korea

How they compare

Hong Kong (China) currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Republic of Korea, a difference of 0.0%.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Republic of Korea has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong (China) ranks 60th and Republic of Korea ranks 60th of 158 countries.

Republic of Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Hong Kong (China)	Republic of Korea	Difference	Ahead
1990s	49.6%	95.9%	46.3%	Republic of Korea
2000s	48.6%	94.9%	46.3%	Republic of Korea
2010s	49.4%	94.4%	45.0%	Republic of Korea
2020s	33.2%	63.0%	29.8%	Republic of Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher binding coverage, all products, Hong Kong (China) or Republic of Korea?: Hong Kong (China), at 0.0% against 0.0% in Republic of Korea as of 2022.
What is the difference in binding coverage, all products between Hong Kong (China) and Republic of Korea?: 0.0%, with Hong Kong (China) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong (China) and Republic of Korea?: 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2022.
How do Hong Kong (China) and Republic of Korea rank globally for binding coverage, all products?: Hong Kong (China) ranks 60th and Republic of Korea ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong (China) vs Republic of Korea: Binding coverage, all products. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/binding-coverage-all-products-percent/hong-kong-sar-china/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/binding-coverage-all-products-percent/hong-kong-sar-china/korea-rep/">Hong Kong (China) vs Republic of Korea: Binding coverage, all products</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Binding coverage, all products (%)
Unit: %
Source: Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 159 places, 3,312 data points, 1995–2022
Last refreshed: 20 August 2026

Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable.