Hong Kong (China) vs Latvia: Binding coverage, all products
Hong Kong (China)
0.0%
in 2022
Latvia
0.0%
in 2022
Hong Kong (China) rank
60th
Latvia rank
60th
Binding coverage, all products over time
- Hong Kong (China)
- Latvia
How they compare
Hong Kong (China) currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Latvia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Hong Kong (China) ahead.
Hong Kong (China) ranks 60th and Latvia ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong (China) | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 48.4% | 85.7% | 37.3% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 49.4% | 100.0% | 50.5% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 33.2% | 66.7% | 33.5% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, all products, Hong Kong (China) or Latvia?
- Hong Kong (China), at 0.0% against 0.0% in Latvia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, all products between Hong Kong (China) and Latvia?
- 0.0%, with Hong Kong (China) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong (China) and Latvia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
- How do Hong Kong (China) and Latvia rank globally for binding coverage, all products?
- Hong Kong (China) ranks 60th and Latvia ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable.