Hong Kong (China) vs Mozambique: Binding coverage, all products
Hong Kong (China)
0.0%
in 2022
Mozambique
14.9%
in 2021
Hong Kong (China) rank
60th
Mozambique rank
59th
Binding coverage, all products over time
- Hong Kong (China)
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 14.9% against 0.0% in Hong Kong (China), a difference of 14.9%.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Hong Kong (China) has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong (China) ranks 60th and Mozambique ranks 59th of 158 countries.
Hong Kong (China) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong (China) | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 49.5% | 14.7% | 34.8% | Hong Kong (China) |
| 2000s | 48.4% | 14.2% | 34.2% | Hong Kong (China) |
| 2010s | 49.2% | 14.0% | 35.2% | Hong Kong (China) |
| 2020s | 49.8% | 14.9% | 34.9% | Hong Kong (China) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, all products, Hong Kong (China) or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 14.9% against 0.0% in Hong Kong (China) as of 2021.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, all products between Hong Kong (China) and Mozambique?
- 14.9%, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong (China) and Mozambique?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2021.
- How do Hong Kong (China) and Mozambique rank globally for binding coverage, all products?
- Hong Kong (China) ranks 60th and Mozambique ranks 59th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable.