Hong Kong (China) vs Romania: Binding coverage, all products
Hong Kong (China)
0.0%
in 2022
Romania
0.0%
in 2022
Hong Kong (China) rank
60th
Romania rank
60th
Binding coverage, all products over time
- Hong Kong (China)
- Romania
How they compare
Hong Kong (China) currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Romania, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Hong Kong (China) ahead.
Hong Kong (China) ranks 60th and Romania ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Hong Kong (China) averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong (China) | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 49.5% | 0.0% | 49.5% | Hong Kong (China) |
| 2000s | 48.4% | 50.0% | 1.6% | Romania |
| 2010s | 49.4% | 100.0% | 50.5% | Romania |
| 2020s | 33.2% | 66.7% | 33.5% | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, all products, Hong Kong (China) or Romania?
- Hong Kong (China), at 0.0% against 0.0% in Romania as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, all products between Hong Kong (China) and Romania?
- 0.0%, with Hong Kong (China) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong (China) and Romania?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2022.
- How do Hong Kong (China) and Romania rank globally for binding coverage, all products?
- Hong Kong (China) ranks 60th and Romania ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable.