Hong Kong, China vs Solomon Islands: Binding coverage, all products
Hong Kong, China
0.0%
in 2022
Solomon Islands
0.0%
in 2022
Hong Kong, China rank
60th
Solomon Islands rank
60th
Binding coverage, all products over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Solomon Islands has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong, China ranks 60th and Solomon Islands ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 48.1% | 100.0% | 51.9% | Solomon Islands |
| 2010s | 49.3% | 100.0% | 50.6% | Solomon Islands |
| 2020s | 33.2% | 66.7% | 33.5% | Solomon Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, all products, Hong Kong, China or Solomon Islands?
- Hong Kong, China, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Solomon Islands as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, all products between Hong Kong, China and Solomon Islands?
- 0.0%, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Solomon Islands?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2022.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Solomon Islands rank globally for binding coverage, all products?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 60th and Solomon Islands ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable.