Hong Kong, China vs Uganda: Binding coverage, all products
Hong Kong, China
0.0%
in 2022
Uganda
0.0%
in 2022
Hong Kong, China rank
60th
Uganda rank
60th
Binding coverage, all products over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Uganda
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Uganda, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 60th and Uganda ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 48.6% | 17.3% | 31.3% | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 49.4% | 16.8% | 32.6% | Hong Kong, China |
| 2020s | 33.2% | 11.4% | 21.8% | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, all products, Hong Kong, China or Uganda?
- Hong Kong, China, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Uganda as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, all products between Hong Kong, China and Uganda?
- 0.0%, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Uganda?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Uganda rank globally for binding coverage, all products?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 60th and Uganda ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable.