Hong Kong, China vs Zambia: Binding coverage, all products
Hong Kong, China
0.0%
in 2022
Zambia
0.0%
in 2022
Hong Kong, China rank
60th
Zambia rank
60th
Binding coverage, all products over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Zambia
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Zambia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 60th and Zambia ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 49.5% | 18.3% | 31.2% | Hong Kong, China |
| 2000s | 48.5% | 17.7% | 30.8% | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 49.3% | 17.6% | 31.7% | Hong Kong, China |
| 2020s | 33.2% | 12.0% | 21.2% | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, all products, Hong Kong, China or Zambia?
- Hong Kong, China, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Zambia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, all products between Hong Kong, China and Zambia?
- 0.0%, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Zambia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2022.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Zambia rank globally for binding coverage, all products?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 60th and Zambia ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable.