Iceland vs South Korea: Binding coverage, all products

Iceland
0.0%
in 2022
South Korea
0.0%
in 2022
Iceland rank
60th
South Korea rank
60th

Binding coverage, all products over time

  • Iceland
  • South Korea
020406080100199520082022

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in South Korea, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1996 it was South Korea ahead.

Iceland ranks 60th and South Korea ranks 60th of 158 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 3 and South Korea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland South Korea Difference Ahead
1990s 95.2% 95.9% 0.6% South Korea
2000s 95.1% 94.9% 0.2% Iceland
2010s 95.2% 94.4% 0.8% Iceland
2020s 47.6% 47.3% 0.4% Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher binding coverage, all products, Iceland or South Korea?
Iceland, at 0.0% against 0.0% in South Korea as of 2022.
What is the difference in binding coverage, all products between Iceland and South Korea?
0.0%, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and South Korea?
22 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2022.
How do Iceland and South Korea rank globally for binding coverage, all products?
Iceland ranks 60th and South Korea ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Binding coverage, all products (%)
Unit
%
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
159 places, 3,312 data points, 1995–2022
Last refreshed

Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable.