Kenya vs South Korea: Binding coverage, all products

Kenya
0.0%
in 2022
South Korea
0.0%
in 2022
Kenya rank
60th
South Korea rank
60th

Binding coverage, all products over time

  • Kenya
  • South Korea
020406080100199520082022

How they compare

Kenya currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in South Korea, a difference of 0.0%.

Across all 21 years both countries report, South Korea has been ahead every year.

Kenya ranks 60th and South Korea ranks 60th of 158 countries.

South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kenya South Korea Difference Ahead
1990s 16.5% 95.9% 79.4% South Korea
2000s 16.0% 94.9% 78.9% South Korea
2010s 16.1% 94.4% 78.3% South Korea
2020s 11.1% 63.0% 51.9% South Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher binding coverage, all products, Kenya or South Korea?
Kenya, at 0.0% against 0.0% in South Korea as of 2022.
What is the difference in binding coverage, all products between Kenya and South Korea?
0.0%, with Kenya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and South Korea?
21 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2022.
How do Kenya and South Korea rank globally for binding coverage, all products?
Kenya ranks 60th and South Korea ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Binding coverage, all products (%)
Unit
%
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
159 places, 3,312 data points, 1995–2022
Last refreshed

Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable.