South Korea vs Tanzania: Binding coverage, all products
South Korea
0.0%
in 2022
Tanzania
0.0%
in 2022
South Korea rank
60th
Tanzania rank
60th
Binding coverage, all products over time
- South Korea
- Tanzania
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Tanzania, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 1997 it was South Korea ahead.
South Korea ranks 60th and Tanzania ranks 60th of 158 countries.
South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 95.9% | 14.4% | 81.5% | South Korea |
| 2000s | 94.8% | 14.0% | 80.8% | South Korea |
| 2010s | 94.4% | 14.3% | 80.1% | South Korea |
| 2020s | 63.0% | 9.8% | 53.2% | South Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, all products, South Korea or Tanzania?
- South Korea, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Tanzania as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, all products between South Korea and Tanzania?
- 0.0%, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Tanzania?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2022.
- How do South Korea and Tanzania rank globally for binding coverage, all products?
- South Korea ranks 60th and Tanzania ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable.