Latvia vs Mozambique: Binding coverage, all products

Latvia
0.0%
in 2022
Mozambique
14.9%
in 2021
Latvia rank
60th
Mozambique rank
59th

Binding coverage, all products over time

  • Latvia
  • Mozambique
020406080100199720092022

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports 14.9% against 0.0% in Latvia, a difference of 14.9%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Mozambique ahead.

Latvia ranks 60th and Mozambique ranks 59th of 158 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Mozambique Difference Ahead
2000s 83.3% 14.2% 69.2% Latvia
2010s 100.0% 14.0% 86.0% Latvia
2020s 100.0% 14.9% 85.1% Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher binding coverage, all products, Latvia or Mozambique?
Mozambique, at 14.9% against 0.0% in Latvia as of 2021.
What is the difference in binding coverage, all products between Latvia and Mozambique?
14.9%, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Mozambique?
14 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
How do Latvia and Mozambique rank globally for binding coverage, all products?
Latvia ranks 60th and Mozambique ranks 59th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Binding coverage, all products (%)
Unit
%
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
159 places, 3,312 data points, 1995–2022
Last refreshed

Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable.