Macau (China) vs New Zealand: Binding coverage, all products
Macau (China)
0.0%
in 2022
New Zealand
0.0%
in 2022
Macau (China) rank
60th
New Zealand rank
60th
Binding coverage, all products over time
- Macau (China)
- New Zealand
How they compare
Macau (China) currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Macau (China) ranks 60th and New Zealand ranks 60th of 158 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Macau (China) | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 31.0% | 100.0% | 69.0% | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 30.2% | 100.0% | 69.8% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 28.4% | 100.0% | 71.6% | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 18.8% | 66.7% | 47.9% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, all products, Macau (China) or New Zealand?
- Macau (China), at 0.0% against 0.0% in New Zealand as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, all products between Macau (China) and New Zealand?
- 0.0%, with Macau (China) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Macau (China) and New Zealand?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2022.
- How do Macau (China) and New Zealand rank globally for binding coverage, all products?
- Macau (China) ranks 60th and New Zealand ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable.