Macao vs Nigeria: Binding coverage, all products

Macao
0.0%
in 2022
Nigeria
0.0%
in 2022
Macao rank
60th
Nigeria rank
60th

Binding coverage, all products over time

  • Macao
  • Nigeria
0102030199520082022

How they compare

Macao currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Nigeria, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Macao ahead.

Macao ranks 60th and Nigeria ranks 60th of 158 countries.

Macao has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macao Nigeria Difference Ahead
1990s 31.0% 21.7% 9.3% Macao
2000s 30.2% 21.2% 9.0% Macao
2010s 28.5% 19.7% 8.9% Macao
2020s 18.8% 13.5% 5.3% Macao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher binding coverage, all products, Macao or Nigeria?
Macao, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Nigeria as of 2022.
What is the difference in binding coverage, all products between Macao and Nigeria?
0.0%, with Macao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macao and Nigeria?
21 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2022.
How do Macao and Nigeria rank globally for binding coverage, all products?
Macao ranks 60th and Nigeria ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Binding coverage, all products (%)
Unit
%
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
159 places, 3,312 data points, 1995–2022
Last refreshed

Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable.