Macao vs Rwanda: Binding coverage, all products
Macao
0.0%
in 2022
Rwanda
0.0%
in 2022
Macao rank
60th
Rwanda rank
60th
Binding coverage, all products over time
- Macao
- Rwanda
How they compare
Macao currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Macao ranks 60th and Rwanda ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Macao | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.2% | 100.0% | 69.8% | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 28.4% | 100.0% | 71.6% | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 18.8% | 66.7% | 47.9% | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, all products, Macao or Rwanda?
- Macao, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Rwanda as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, all products between Macao and Rwanda?
- 0.0%, with Macao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Macao and Rwanda?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Macao and Rwanda rank globally for binding coverage, all products?
- Macao ranks 60th and Rwanda ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable.