Macau (China) vs South Africa: Binding coverage, all products
Macau (China)
0.0%
in 2022
South Africa
0.0%
in 2022
Macau (China) rank
60th
South Africa rank
60th
Binding coverage, all products over time
- Macau (China)
- South Africa
How they compare
Macau (China) currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in South Africa, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Macau (China) ranks 60th and South Africa ranks 60th of 158 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Macau (China) | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 31.0% | 96.6% | 65.5% | South Africa |
| 2000s | 30.2% | 96.3% | 66.0% | South Africa |
| 2010s | 28.4% | 94.7% | 66.3% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 18.8% | 62.9% | 44.2% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, all products, Macau (China) or South Africa?
- Macau (China), at 0.0% against 0.0% in South Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, all products between Macau (China) and South Africa?
- 0.0%, with Macau (China) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Macau (China) and South Africa?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2022.
- How do Macau (China) and South Africa rank globally for binding coverage, all products?
- Macau (China) ranks 60th and South Africa ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable.