Macao vs Tanzania: Binding coverage, all products
Macao
0.0%
in 2022
Tanzania
0.0%
in 2022
Macao rank
60th
Tanzania rank
60th
Binding coverage, all products over time
- Macao
- Tanzania
How they compare
Macao currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Tanzania, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Macao ahead.
Macao ranks 60th and Tanzania ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Macao has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Macao | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 31.0% | 14.4% | 16.7% | Macao |
| 2000s | 30.1% | 14.0% | 16.1% | Macao |
| 2010s | 28.4% | 14.3% | 14.1% | Macao |
| 2020s | 18.8% | 9.8% | 9.0% | Macao |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, all products, Macao or Tanzania?
- Macao, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Tanzania as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, all products between Macao and Tanzania?
- 0.0%, with Macao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Macao and Tanzania?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2022.
- How do Macao and Tanzania rank globally for binding coverage, all products?
- Macao ranks 60th and Tanzania ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable.