Malawi vs Suriname: Binding coverage, all products
Malawi
33.9%
in 2021
Suriname
27.4%
in 2022
Malawi rank
53rd
Suriname rank
55th
Binding coverage, all products over time
- Malawi
- Suriname
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 33.9% against 27.4% in Suriname, a difference of 6.5%.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.2 times Suriname's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 53rd and Suriname ranks 55th of 158 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 34.2% | 28.9% | 5.3% | Malawi |
| 2000s | 33.1% | 28.2% | 4.9% | Malawi |
| 2010s | 32.5% | 27.7% | 4.8% | Malawi |
| 2020s | 33.9% | 27.4% | 6.5% | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, all products, Malawi or Suriname?
- Malawi, at 33.9% against 27.4% in Suriname as of 2021.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, all products between Malawi and Suriname?
- 6.5%, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Suriname?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2021.
- How do Malawi and Suriname rank globally for binding coverage, all products?
- Malawi ranks 53rd and Suriname ranks 55th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable.