Mauritius vs Zambia: Binding coverage, all products
Mauritius
0.0%
in 2022
Zambia
0.0%
in 2022
Mauritius rank
60th
Zambia rank
60th
Binding coverage, all products over time
- Mauritius
- Zambia
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Zambia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 60th and Zambia ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 22.3% | 18.3% | 4.0% | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 21.6% | 17.6% | 4.0% | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 21.0% | 17.6% | 3.4% | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 14.3% | 12.0% | 2.3% | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, all products, Mauritius or Zambia?
- Mauritius, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Zambia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, all products between Mauritius and Zambia?
- 0.0%, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Zambia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2022.
- How do Mauritius and Zambia rank globally for binding coverage, all products?
- Mauritius ranks 60th and Zambia ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable.