Oman vs Zambia: Binding coverage, all products

Oman
0.0%
in 2022
Zambia
0.0%
in 2022
Oman rank
60th
Zambia rank
60th

Binding coverage, all products over time

  • Oman
  • Zambia
020406080100199720092022

How they compare

Oman currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Zambia, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Oman ahead.

Oman ranks 60th and Zambia ranks 60th of 158 countries.

Oman has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Oman Zambia Difference Ahead
2000s 100.0% 17.7% 82.3% Oman
2010s 100.0% 17.9% 82.2% Oman
2020s 66.7% 12.0% 54.7% Oman

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher binding coverage, all products, Oman or Zambia?
Oman, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Zambia as of 2022.
What is the difference in binding coverage, all products between Oman and Zambia?
0.0%, with Oman ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Zambia?
17 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
How do Oman and Zambia rank globally for binding coverage, all products?
Oman ranks 60th and Zambia ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Binding coverage, all products (%)
Unit
%
Source
Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
159 places, 3,312 data points, 1995–2022
Last refreshed

Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable.