Panama vs Tanzania: Binding coverage, all products
Panama
0.0%
in 2022
Tanzania
0.0%
in 2022
Panama rank
60th
Tanzania rank
60th
Binding coverage, all products over time
- Panama
- Tanzania
How they compare
Panama currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Tanzania, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Panama ahead.
Panama ranks 60th and Tanzania ranks 60th of 158 regions.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 97.4% | 14.4% | 83.1% | Panama |
| 2000s | 97.2% | 14.0% | 83.2% | Panama |
| 2010s | 95.1% | 14.1% | 81.1% | Panama |
| 2020s | 62.6% | 9.8% | 52.8% | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, all products, Panama or Tanzania?
- Panama, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Tanzania as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, all products between Panama and Tanzania?
- 0.0%, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Tanzania?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2022.
- How do Panama and Tanzania rank globally for binding coverage, all products?
- Panama ranks 60th and Tanzania ranks 60th of 158 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable.