Singapore vs Tunisia: Binding coverage, all products
Singapore
72.0%
in 2022
Tunisia
58.2%
in 2016
Singapore rank
46th
Tunisia rank
48th
Binding coverage, all products over time
- Singapore
- Tunisia
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 72.0% against 58.2% in Tunisia, a difference of 13.8%.
That makes Singapore's figure about 1.2 times Tunisia's.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
Singapore ranks 46th and Tunisia ranks 48th of 158 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Singapore | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 71.8% | 58.8% | 13.0% | Singapore |
| 2000s | 71.2% | 58.3% | 12.9% | Singapore |
| 2010s | 70.9% | 58.3% | 12.5% | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, all products, Singapore or Tunisia?
- Singapore, at 72.0% against 58.2% in Tunisia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, all products between Singapore and Tunisia?
- 13.8%, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Tunisia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2016.
- How do Singapore and Tunisia rank globally for binding coverage, all products?
- Singapore ranks 46th and Tunisia ranks 48th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable.