Sri Lanka vs Tunisia: Binding coverage, all products
Sri Lanka
40.6%
in 2021
Tunisia
58.2%
in 2016
Sri Lanka rank
51st
Tunisia rank
48th
Binding coverage, all products over time
- Sri Lanka
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 58.2% against 40.6% in Sri Lanka, a difference of 17.6%.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.4 times Sri Lanka's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.
Sri Lanka ranks 51st and Tunisia ranks 48th of 158 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 40.5% | 58.6% | 18.1% | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 38.6% | 58.2% | 19.7% | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 39.5% | 58.4% | 18.9% | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, all products, Sri Lanka or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 58.2% against 40.6% in Sri Lanka as of 2016.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, all products between Sri Lanka and Tunisia?
- 17.6%, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Tunisia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2015.
- How do Sri Lanka and Tunisia rank globally for binding coverage, all products?
- Sri Lanka ranks 51st and Tunisia ranks 48th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable.