Suriname vs Zimbabwe: Binding coverage, all products
Suriname
27.4%
in 2022
Zimbabwe
24.4%
in 2021
Suriname rank
55th
Zimbabwe rank
56th
Binding coverage, all products over time
- Suriname
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 27.4% against 24.4% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 3.0%.
That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Suriname ranks 55th and Zimbabwe ranks 56th of 158 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Suriname | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 28.9% | 24.4% | 4.5% | Suriname |
| 2000s | 28.9% | 23.2% | 5.7% | Suriname |
| 2010s | 27.8% | 22.4% | 5.4% | Suriname |
| 2020s | 27.4% | 24.4% | 3.1% | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, all products, Suriname or Zimbabwe?
- Suriname, at 27.4% against 24.4% in Zimbabwe as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, all products between Suriname and Zimbabwe?
- 3.0%, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Zimbabwe?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2021.
- How do Suriname and Zimbabwe rank globally for binding coverage, all products?
- Suriname ranks 55th and Zimbabwe ranks 56th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable.