Congo, Dem. Rep. vs Uruguay: Binding coverage, manufactured products
Congo, Dem. Rep.
100.0%
in 2020
Uruguay
100.0%
in 2022
Congo, Dem. Rep. rank
1st
Uruguay rank
1st
Binding coverage, manufactured products over time
- Congo, Dem. Rep.
- Uruguay
How they compare
Congo, Dem. Rep. currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Uruguay, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Congo, Dem. Rep. ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 158 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo, Dem. Rep. | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2020s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, manufactured products, Congo, Dem. Rep. or Uruguay?
- Congo, Dem. Rep., at 100.0% against 100.0% in Uruguay as of 2020.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, manufactured products between Congo, Dem. Rep. and Uruguay?
- 0.0%, with Congo, Dem. Rep. ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Dem. Rep. and Uruguay?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Congo, Dem. Rep. and Uruguay rank globally for binding coverage, manufactured products?
- Congo, Dem. Rep. ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, manufactured products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Manufactured products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 5-8 excluding division 68.