Congo vs South Africa: Binding coverage, manufactured products
Congo
0.0%
in 2022
South Africa
0.0%
in 2022
Congo rank
60th
South Africa rank
60th
Binding coverage, manufactured products over time
- Congo
- South Africa
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in South Africa, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 16 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 60th and South Africa ranks 60th of 158 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.4% | 99.5% | 93.1% | South Africa |
| 2000s | 5.8% | 99.4% | 93.7% | South Africa |
| 2010s | 5.0% | 99.4% | 94.5% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, manufactured products, Congo or South Africa?
- Congo, at 0.0% against 0.0% in South Africa as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, manufactured products between Congo and South Africa?
- 0.0%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and South Africa?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2022.
- How do Congo and South Africa rank globally for binding coverage, manufactured products?
- Congo ranks 60th and South Africa ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, manufactured products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Manufactured products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 5-8 excluding division 68.