Estonia vs Guinea-Bissau: Binding coverage, manufactured products
Estonia
0.0%
in 2022
Guinea-Bissau
0.0%
in 2022
Estonia rank
60th
Guinea-Bissau rank
60th
Binding coverage, manufactured products over time
- Estonia
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.
Estonia ranks 60th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 2 and Guinea-Bissau in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.7% | 98.1% | 31.4% | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 98.1% | 1.9% | Estonia |
| 2020s | 66.7% | 65.4% | 1.3% | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, manufactured products, Estonia or Guinea-Bissau?
- Estonia, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Guinea-Bissau as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, manufactured products between Estonia and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0.0%, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Guinea-Bissau?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
- How do Estonia and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for binding coverage, manufactured products?
- Estonia ranks 60th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, manufactured products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Manufactured products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 5-8 excluding division 68.