Gambia vs Latvia: Binding coverage, manufactured products
Gambia
0.0%
in 2022
Latvia
0.0%
in 2022
Gambia rank
60th
Latvia rank
60th
Binding coverage, manufactured products over time
- Gambia
- Latvia
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Latvia, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Gambia ranks 60th and Latvia ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.0% | 100.0% | 97.0% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 1.7% | 100.0% | 98.3% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 1.0% | 66.7% | 65.6% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, manufactured products, Gambia or Latvia?
- Gambia, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Latvia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, manufactured products between Gambia and Latvia?
- 0.0%, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Latvia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2022.
- How do Gambia and Latvia rank globally for binding coverage, manufactured products?
- Gambia ranks 60th and Latvia ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, manufactured products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Manufactured products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 5-8 excluding division 68.