Which has higher binding coverage, manufactured products, Hong Kong or Tanzania, United Republic of?

Hong Kong, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2022.

How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Tanzania, United Republic of?

21 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2022.

Where does this data come from?

Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, manufactured products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Hong Kong vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Binding coverage, manufactured products

Hong Kong

0.0%

in 2022

Tanzania, United Republic of

0.0%

in 2022

Hong Kong rank

60th

Tanzania, United Republic of rank

60th

Binding coverage, manufactured products over time

Hong Kong
Tanzania, United Republic of

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Hong Kong ahead.

Hong Kong ranks 60th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 60th of 158 countries.

Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Hong Kong	Tanzania, United Republic of	Difference	Ahead
1990s	38.9%	2.5%	36.5%	Hong Kong
2000s	37.1%	2.0%	35.1%	Hong Kong
2010s	36.3%	1.2%	35.0%	Hong Kong
2020s	24.2%	0.8%	23.4%	Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher binding coverage, manufactured products, Hong Kong or Tanzania, United Republic of?: Hong Kong, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2022.
What is the difference in binding coverage, manufactured products between Hong Kong and Tanzania, United Republic of?: 0.0%, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Tanzania, United Republic of?: 21 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2022.
How do Hong Kong and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for binding coverage, manufactured products?: Hong Kong ranks 60th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, manufactured products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Binding coverage, manufactured products. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/binding-coverage-manufactured-products-percent/hong-kong-sar-china/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/binding-coverage-manufactured-products-percent/hong-kong-sar-china/tanzania/">Hong Kong vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Binding coverage, manufactured products</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Binding coverage, manufactured products (%)
Unit: %
Source: Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 159 places, 3,312 data points, 1995–2022
Last refreshed: 20 August 2026

Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Manufactured products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 5-8 excluding division 68.