Latvia vs Namibia: Binding coverage, manufactured products
Latvia
0.0%
in 2022
Namibia
0.0%
in 2022
Latvia rank
60th
Namibia rank
60th
Binding coverage, manufactured products over time
- Latvia
- Namibia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Namibia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Namibia ahead.
Latvia ranks 60th and Namibia ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.7% | 99.4% | 13.7% | Namibia |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 99.4% | 0.6% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 66.7% | 66.3% | 0.4% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, manufactured products, Latvia or Namibia?
- Latvia, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Namibia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, manufactured products between Latvia and Namibia?
- 0.0%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Namibia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
- How do Latvia and Namibia rank globally for binding coverage, manufactured products?
- Latvia ranks 60th and Namibia ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, manufactured products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Manufactured products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 5-8 excluding division 68.