Which has higher binding coverage, manufactured products, Malaysia or Tanzania, United Republic of?

Malaysia, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2022.

How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Tanzania, United Republic of?

18 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2022.

Where does this data come from?

Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, manufactured products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Malaysia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Binding coverage, manufactured products

Malaysia

0.0%

in 2022

Tanzania, United Republic of

0.0%

in 2022

Malaysia rank

60th

Tanzania, United Republic of rank

60th

Binding coverage, manufactured products over time

Malaysia
Tanzania, United Republic of

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Malaysia ahead.

Malaysia ranks 60th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 60th of 158 countries.

Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Malaysia	Tanzania, United Republic of	Difference	Ahead
1990s	84.4%	2.5%	82.0%	Malaysia
2000s	84.3%	2.0%	82.4%	Malaysia
2010s	84.3%	1.2%	83.1%	Malaysia
2020s	56.2%	0.8%	55.4%	Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher binding coverage, manufactured products, Malaysia or Tanzania, United Republic of?: Malaysia, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2022.
What is the difference in binding coverage, manufactured products between Malaysia and Tanzania, United Republic of?: 0.0%, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Tanzania, United Republic of?: 18 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2022.
How do Malaysia and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for binding coverage, manufactured products?: Malaysia ranks 60th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, manufactured products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Binding coverage, manufactured products. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/binding-coverage-manufactured-products-percent/malaysia/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/binding-coverage-manufactured-products-percent/malaysia/tanzania/">Malaysia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Binding coverage, manufactured products</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Binding coverage, manufactured products (%)
Unit: %
Source: Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 159 places, 3,312 data points, 1995–2022
Last refreshed: 06 August 2026

Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Manufactured products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 5-8 excluding division 68.