Namibia vs Tanzania: Binding coverage, manufactured products
Namibia
0.0%
in 2022
Tanzania
0.0%
in 2022
Namibia rank
60th
Tanzania rank
60th
Binding coverage, manufactured products over time
- Namibia
- Tanzania
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Tanzania, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Namibia ahead.
Namibia ranks 60th and Tanzania ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 99.4% | 1.8% | 97.7% | Namibia |
| 2010s | 99.4% | 1.2% | 98.2% | Namibia |
| 2020s | 66.3% | 0.8% | 65.5% | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, manufactured products, Namibia or Tanzania?
- Namibia, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Tanzania as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, manufactured products between Namibia and Tanzania?
- 0.0%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Tanzania?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Namibia and Tanzania rank globally for binding coverage, manufactured products?
- Namibia ranks 60th and Tanzania ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, manufactured products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Manufactured products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 5-8 excluding division 68.