Angola vs Papua New Guinea: Binding coverage, primary products
Angola
99.9%
in 2022
Papua New Guinea
99.9%
in 2021
Angola rank
6th
Papua New Guinea rank
6th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Angola
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Angola currently reports 99.9% against 99.9% in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Angola ranks 6th and Papua New Guinea ranks 6th of 158 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 100.0% | 100.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2020s | 99.9% | 99.9% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Angola or Papua New Guinea?
- Angola, at 99.9% against 99.9% in Papua New Guinea as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Angola and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.0%, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Papua New Guinea?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2021.
- How do Angola and Papua New Guinea rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Angola ranks 6th and Papua New Guinea ranks 6th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).