Australia vs Burkina Faso: Binding coverage, primary products
Australia
0.0%
in 2022
Burkina Faso
0.0%
in 2022
Australia rank
60th
Burkina Faso rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Australia
- Burkina Faso
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 60th and Burkina Faso ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Burkina Faso | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 99.0% | 58.4% | 40.6% | Australia |
| 2010s | 99.1% | 57.2% | 41.8% | Australia |
| 2020s | 66.0% | 38.0% | 28.0% | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Australia or Burkina Faso?
- Australia, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Burkina Faso as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Australia and Burkina Faso?
- 0.0%, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Burkina Faso?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
- How do Australia and Burkina Faso rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Australia ranks 60th and Burkina Faso ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).