Australia vs Cyprus: Binding coverage, primary products
Australia
0.0%
in 2022
Cyprus
0.0%
in 2022
Australia rank
60th
Cyprus rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Australia
- Cyprus
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Cyprus, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 60th and Cyprus ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Cyprus in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Cyprus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 99.0% | 0.0% | 99.0% | Australia |
| 2000s | 99.0% | 66.7% | 32.4% | Australia |
| 2010s | 99.1% | 100.0% | 0.9% | Cyprus |
| 2020s | 66.0% | 66.6% | 0.6% | Cyprus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Australia or Cyprus?
- Australia, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Cyprus as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Australia and Cyprus?
- 0.0%, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Cyprus?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2022.
- How do Australia and Cyprus rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Australia ranks 60th and Cyprus ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).