Australia vs Indonesia: Binding coverage, primary products
Australia
0.0%
in 2022
Indonesia
0.0%
in 2022
Australia rank
60th
Indonesia rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Australia
- Indonesia
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Indonesia, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Indonesia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 60th and Indonesia ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 99.0% | 99.3% | 0.3% | Indonesia |
| 2000s | 99.0% | 99.2% | 0.2% | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 99.1% | 99.3% | 0.2% | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 66.0% | 66.2% | 0.1% | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Australia or Indonesia?
- Australia, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Indonesia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Australia and Indonesia?
- 0.0%, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Indonesia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2022.
- How do Australia and Indonesia rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Australia ranks 60th and Indonesia ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).