Bangladesh vs Finland: Binding coverage, primary products
Bangladesh
53.6%
in 2022
Finland
0.0%
in 2022
Bangladesh rank
58th
Finland rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Bangladesh
- Finland
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 53.6% against 0.0% in Finland, a difference of 53.6%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Finland ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 58th and Finland ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.0% | 100.0% | 44.0% | Finland |
| 2010s | 53.7% | 100.0% | 46.3% | Finland |
| 2020s | 53.6% | 66.6% | 13.0% | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Bangladesh or Finland?
- Bangladesh, at 53.6% against 0.0% in Finland as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Bangladesh and Finland?
- 53.6%, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Finland?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Bangladesh and Finland rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Bangladesh ranks 58th and Finland ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).