Barbados vs Singapore: Binding coverage, primary products
Barbados
83.8%
in 2022
Singapore
85.6%
in 2022
Barbados rank
42nd
Singapore rank
41st
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Barbados
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 85.6% against 83.8% in Barbados, a difference of 1.8%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 42nd and Singapore ranks 41st of 158 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 3 and Singapore in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 90.5% | 83.8% | 6.8% | Barbados |
| 2000s | 90.7% | 83.7% | 6.9% | Barbados |
| 2010s | 89.8% | 84.8% | 5.0% | Barbados |
| 2020s | 83.8% | 85.6% | 1.8% | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Barbados or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 85.6% against 83.8% in Barbados as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Barbados and Singapore?
- 1.8%, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Singapore?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2022.
- How do Barbados and Singapore rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Barbados ranks 42nd and Singapore ranks 41st of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).