Botswana vs Hong Kong: Binding coverage, primary products
Botswana
0.0%
in 2022
Hong Kong
0.0%
in 2022
Botswana rank
60th
Hong Kong rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Botswana
- Hong Kong
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 60th and Hong Kong ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Hong Kong | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.3% | 87.1% | 0.7% | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 81.3% | 88.6% | 7.3% | Hong Kong |
| 2020s | 53.7% | 59.2% | 5.5% | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Botswana or Hong Kong?
- Botswana, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Hong Kong as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Botswana and Hong Kong?
- 0.0%, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Hong Kong?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
- How do Botswana and Hong Kong rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Botswana ranks 60th and Hong Kong ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).