Botswana vs Iceland: Binding coverage, primary products
Botswana
0.0%
in 2022
Iceland
0.0%
in 2022
Botswana rank
60th
Iceland rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Botswana
- Iceland
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Iceland, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 60th and Iceland ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.3% | 96.4% | 10.1% | Iceland |
| 2010s | 81.4% | 96.8% | 15.5% | Iceland |
| 2020s | 40.2% | 48.4% | 8.2% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Botswana or Iceland?
- Botswana, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Iceland as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Botswana and Iceland?
- 0.0%, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Iceland?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
- How do Botswana and Iceland rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Botswana ranks 60th and Iceland ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).