Botswana vs Latvia: Binding coverage, primary products
Botswana
0.0%
in 2022
Latvia
0.0%
in 2022
Botswana rank
60th
Latvia rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Botswana
- Latvia
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Latvia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 60th and Latvia ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.3% | 85.7% | 0.6% | Botswana |
| 2010s | 81.3% | 100.0% | 18.7% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 53.7% | 66.6% | 12.9% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Botswana or Latvia?
- Botswana, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Latvia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Botswana and Latvia?
- 0.0%, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Latvia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
- How do Botswana and Latvia rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Botswana ranks 60th and Latvia ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).