Botswana vs Macao: Binding coverage, primary products
Botswana
0.0%
in 2022
Macao
0.0%
in 2022
Botswana rank
60th
Macao rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Botswana
- Macao
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Macao, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 60th and Macao ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Macao | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.3% | 60.1% | 26.3% | Botswana |
| 2010s | 81.3% | 53.4% | 27.8% | Botswana |
| 2020s | 53.7% | 34.9% | 18.7% | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Botswana or Macao?
- Botswana, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Macao as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Botswana and Macao?
- 0.0%, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Macao?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
- How do Botswana and Macao rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Botswana ranks 60th and Macao ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).