Burkina Faso vs Iceland: Binding coverage, primary products
Burkina Faso
0.0%
in 2022
Iceland
0.0%
in 2022
Burkina Faso rank
60th
Iceland rank
60th
Binding coverage, primary products over time
- Burkina Faso
- Iceland
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Iceland, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Burkina Faso ranks 60th and Iceland ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 58.3% | 96.4% | 38.1% | Iceland |
| 2010s | 57.3% | 96.8% | 39.6% | Iceland |
| 2020s | 28.5% | 48.4% | 19.9% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Burkina Faso or Iceland?
- Burkina Faso, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Iceland as of 2022.
- What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Burkina Faso and Iceland?
- 0.0%, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Iceland?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
- How do Burkina Faso and Iceland rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?
- Burkina Faso ranks 60th and Iceland ranks 60th of 158 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).