Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Burundi or Hong Kong (China)?

Burundi, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Hong Kong (China) as of 2022.

How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Hong Kong (China)?

19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.

Where does this data come from?

Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Burundi vs Hong Kong (China): Binding coverage, primary products

Burundi

0.0%

in 2022

Hong Kong (China)

0.0%

in 2022

Burundi rank

60th

Hong Kong (China) rank

60th

Binding coverage, primary products over time

Burundi
Hong Kong (China)

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Hong Kong (China), a difference of 0.0%.

Across all 19 years both countries report, Hong Kong (China) has been ahead every year.

Burundi ranks 60th and Hong Kong (China) ranks 60th of 158 countries.

Hong Kong (China) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Burundi	Hong Kong (China)	Difference	Ahead
2000s	55.7%	87.0%	31.4%	Hong Kong (China)
2010s	53.5%	88.6%	35.1%	Hong Kong (China)
2020s	35.8%	59.2%	23.4%	Hong Kong (China)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher binding coverage, primary products, Burundi or Hong Kong (China)?: Burundi, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Hong Kong (China) as of 2022.
What is the difference in binding coverage, primary products between Burundi and Hong Kong (China)?: 0.0%, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Hong Kong (China)?: 19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
How do Burundi and Hong Kong (China) rank globally for binding coverage, primary products?: Burundi ranks 60th and Hong Kong (China) ranks 60th of 158 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Staff estimates, World Bank (WB), published as Binding coverage, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Hong Kong (China): Binding coverage, primary products. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/binding-coverage-primary-products-percent/burundi/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/binding-coverage-primary-products-percent/burundi/hong-kong-sar-china/">Burundi vs Hong Kong (China): Binding coverage, primary products</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Binding coverage, primary products (%)
Unit: %
Source: Staff estimates, World Bank (WB)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 159 places, 3,312 data points, 1995–2022
Last refreshed: 06 August 2026

Binding coverage is the percentage of product lines with an agreed bound rate. Bound rates result from trade negotiations incorporated into a country's schedule of concessions and are thus enforceable. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).